Friday, 21 May 2010
There is no need to defend land unless property is being damaged
Protecting land from someone seeking to make good use of it is unnecessary and violent. Provided the interloper is not damaging your goods and property, such as crops that you have planted yourself then we have no right to use force to defend the land. It is not necessary to use force to defend land rights against someone who has not damaged property. If property is not being damaged then it is not necessary to defend land rights.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment